596,903
Lines of Code
$65,054
Total Cost
23–84×
ROI Range
CEM Validation Portfolio
15 case studies documenting how the Compounding Execution Method was built and validated — build narratives, mechanism deep dives, and portfolio-wide analysis.
CS-01
The Flagship Build
CEM Validation Portfolio
One platform replaced six paid tools
A multi-vertical business replaced 6 SaaS platforms and a contractor team with one internal system. 135 database tables. 616,543 leads processed. 90% cost reduction.
194,954
Lines of code
13.4×
Speed increase
$82,640
Annual savings
Related:
M2
M7
M27
Read case study
CS-02
Five Days to Production
CEM Validation Portfolio
Zero to revenue-ready in 120 hours
By the 9th product, the foundation was deep enough to ship a new product in a new vertical in 5 days — 100% solo, $0 outside cost.
5 days
To production
100%
Solo execution
$0
Outside cost
Related:
M2
M8
M25
Read case study
CS-03
One Scaffold, Four Products
CEM Validation Portfolio
One codebase deployed into four markets
Four insurance verticals from one shared infrastructure. Quality nearly identical across all four — the scaffold propagates quality into every deployment.
4
Products shipped
3.7%
Best defect rate
79%
Cost reduction
Related:
M12
M11
Read case study
CS-04
The Recovery Build
CEM Validation Portfolio
Two breakages. Two recoveries. Shipped on time.
A seasonal e-commerce platform with a hard December 24th deadline. Things broke twice. The method recovered it twice. Final phase: zero issues.
0%
Final defect rate
113
Peak sprint units
7
External integrations
Related:
M7
M15
Read case study
CS-05
Same Product, New Country
CEM Validation Portfolio
South Africa → United States in 16 days
A working insurance platform redeployed across borders. Different currency, carriers, compliance — same core architecture. 2.9x the daily output of the original build.
2
Countries served
16 days
US market entry
~$330
Expansion cost
Related:
M12
M11
Read case study
CS-06
The Full Portfolio
CEM Validation Portfolio
The complete picture — every system, every metric
The aggregate view. 10 production systems, 7 verticals, 2 geographies. $65,054 total build cost against $795K–$2.9M replacement value. Every metric moving in the same direction.
596,903
Lines of code
10
Systems shipped
23–84×
Return on investment
Related:
M2
M7
M27
Read case study
CS-07
The Independence Curve
CEM Validation Portfolio
From directing others to doing it all — in 4 months
Started by managing contractors who did 69% of the work. Four months later: 100% solo execution, $0 outside cost, fastest build in the portfolio.
69→7%
Outside dependency
$7,995→$0
Contractor cost
4 mo
To full independence
Related:
M2
M3
Read case study
CS-08
The Cost Inversion
CEM Validation Portfolio
The full financial breakdown — every dollar traced
The economics of the full portfolio: $67,895 actual cost vs $795K–$2.9M replacement value. Monthly burn dropped from $8,367 to $825. The 9th product cost $0 to build.
$67,895
Actual cost
12–43×
Cost advantage
90%
Burn rate reduction
Related:
M2
M27
Read case study
CS-09
Zero to Builder
CEM Validation Portfolio
No engineering background — 10 production systems
Zero prior software engineering experience. 10 production systems in 4 months. 100% solo execution on the final builds. Business expertise was the real foundation.
0
Prior experience
10
Systems shipped
4 mo
Transformation time
Related:
M2
M3
Read case study
CS-10
The Platform Displacement
CEM Validation Portfolio
Six vendors replaced — $82,640 displaced
Deep dive into what it means to replace 6 SaaS vendors with owned infrastructure. $82,640 displaced. Data unified from 6 silos into one. Monthly burn dropped 87%.
6
Platforms replaced
$82,640
Costs displaced
616,543
Leads processed
Related:
M2
Read case study
CS-11
The Governor
CEM Validation Portfolio
116 days sustained execution — zero burnout
High-output work destroys people. The Governor mechanism prevented that across 116 days and 10 systems. Output accelerated through the window, not despite it.
116
Calendar days
0
Burnout incidents
4.6→61.5
Daily output trend
Related:
M7
M15
Read case study
CS-12
The Drift Tax
CEM Validation Portfolio
The real cost of AI — measured and managed
AI gets things wrong 12–15% of the time. The Drift Tax — 3–4% of total output — is the cost of catching and fixing it. The net result is still a 4.6x output multiplier.
12–15%
AI false signal rate
3–4%
Drift Tax (rework)
4.6×
Net output multiplier
Related:
M27
M21
Read case study
CS-13
The Foundation Effect
CEM Validation Portfolio
Compounding execution — the data behind the claim
The compounding claim, with numbers. Build time compressed from 24 to 5 days. Cost fell from $7,995 to $0. Quality held or improved. Three curves, all moving together.
24→5
Days to ship
$7,995→$0
Cost per project
95%+
Template reuse (mature)
Related:
M2
M12
Read case study
CS-14
Quality at Speed
CEM Validation Portfolio
12.1% defects at 4.6x speed — no tradeoff
The conventional wisdom says speed kills quality. Portfolio data shows the opposite: 12.1% defect rate at 4.6x output. The fastest builds had the lowest rework.
12.1%
Portfolio defect rate
4.6×
Output multiplier
3.7%
Best project quality
Related:
M7
M21
Read case study
CS-15
The Scaffold
CEM Validation Portfolio
One architecture — deploy new verticals in days
The Scaffold provides everything except product-specific logic. 80% deploys on day one. Four insurance verticals. Two geographies. Fastest deployment: 5 days at $0.
10
Products deployed
7
Verticals covered
5 days
Fastest deployment
Related:
M12
M11
M2
Read case study
Operator Portfolio
8 case studies from production business operations — product launches, revenue attribution, market expansion, and complete lifecycle data.
CS-16
The Product Launch Engine
Operator Portfolio
38 products tested — 6 scaled to $1M+ total
38 products tested over 28 months through shared infrastructure. 6 reached meaningful scale, driving 94.5% of net revenue. The 23 micro-tests cost almost nothing.
38
Products tested
6
Reached scale
$1.08M
Gross revenue
Read case study
CS-17
The Affiliate Dependency Inversion
Operator Portfolio
96.9% affiliate dependency inverted to 95% owned
One affiliate drove 96.9% of revenue. It disappeared. Revenue collapsed 99.8%. The owned traffic infrastructure built during the trough is what kept the business alive.
96.9%
Peak dependency
8 mo
Trough duration
95%
Now owned traffic
Read case study
CS-18
The Dual-Currency Processing Operation
Operator Portfolio
Two currencies, two countries, one operator
Simultaneous payment infrastructure across South Africa and the US. R15.2M ZAR and $939K USD processed through 42 hosting accounts and 149K transaction logs.
R15.2M
ZAR processed
$939K
USD processed
42
Hosting accounts
Read case study
CS-19
The PRJ-01 Product Story
Operator Portfolio
The CDP that replaced a $1,565/mo vendor stack
A Customer Data Platform — lead lifecycle management, affiliate tracking, e-commerce, identity resolution, audience segmentation, and revenue attribution in one stack.
194,954
Lines of code
616,543
Leads processed
$16,800
Build cost
Read case study
CS-20
The Zero-Competition Niche
Operator Portfolio
Zero competition — $38.5B industry, no incumbent
A $38.5 billion industry with 57% dispute rates, $50–$150 per-lead economics, and zero dedicated digital infrastructure. Built in 9 days for $303.
373K
HOA associations
0
Dedicated competitors
$303
Build cost
Read case study
CS-21
The Revenue Attribution System
Operator Portfolio
Every dollar traced — 15 views, 7 dimensions
Revenue attribution across product, affiliate, campaign, time, transaction type, currency, and payout — 15 structured views that most businesses at this stage never build.
15
Data views
7
Attribution dimensions
$1.08M
Revenue attributed
Read case study
CS-22
The CDP Disruptor
Operator Portfolio
$79/mo vs $1,500/mo — 8 unique capabilities
PRJ-01 enters the lead management market at $79/month — 19x cheaper than LeadsPedia — with 8 capabilities no competitor offers at any price.
$79/mo
Entry price
19×
Price advantage
8
Unique capabilities
Read case study
CS-23
The PRD-01 Arc
Operator Portfolio
$0 to $173K/mo to wind-down — the full arc
Most case studies show a launch. This shows the full arc — $0 to $173K/month peak to wind-down. The infrastructure survived the product and powered every subsequent launch.
$509K
Net revenue
$173K
Peak month
6.0%
Refund rate
Read case study